SARS-CoV-2 vaccine alleviates disease burden and severity in liver transplant recipients even with low antibody titers.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We retrospectively assessed the clinical Pfizer's mRNA SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination outcomes and the serologic impact on liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven LT cases followed between March 1, 2020 and September 25, 2021, and were stratified into two groups: (1) 37 LT recipients after SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccine era and (2) 130 LT recipients vaccinated with 2 doses without earlier SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Serum SARS-CoV-2 spike immunoglobulins (anti-S) were assessed 7 days following vaccination (Liaison assay). RESULTS: In addition to the 37 nonvaccinated cases (22.2% of total group) who experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection (34 symptomatic and 3 asymptomatic), another 8 vaccinated symptomatic recipients (4.8%) were infected (5 from the third and three from the fourth waves). Three of the 45 infected cases died (6.7%) before the vaccine program. Vaccinated group: of the 130 LT vaccinated recipients, 8 (6.2%) got infected postvaccination (added to the infected group) and were defined as clinical vaccine failure; 38 (29.2%) were serological vaccine failure (total failure 35.4%), and 64.6% cases were serological vaccine responders (anti-S≥19 AU/mL). Longer post-LT interval and lower consumption of immunosuppressants (steroids, FK506, and mycophenolate mofetil) correlated with favorable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors improved vaccine outcomes associated with lower FK506 dosages and serum levels. Patients with anti-S levels <100 AU/mL risked losing serologic response or being infected with SARS-CoV-2. A booster dose achieved an effective serologic response in a third of failures and most responders, securing better and possibly longer protection. CONCLUSION: Pfizer's BNT162b2 vaccine seems to lessen SARS-CoV-2 morbidity and mortality of LT recipients even with weak serological immunogenicity. Switching mycophenolate mofetil to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors might be effective before boosters in vaccine failure cases. A booster vaccine should be considered for nonresponders and low-responders after the second dose.

COVID-19 in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Israeli Experience.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affecting millions of people worldwide. IBD therapies, designed for continuous immune suppression, often render patients more susceptible to infections. The effect of the immune suppression on the risk of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is not fully determined yet. OBJECTIVE: To describe COVID-19 characteristics and outcomes and to evaluate the association between IBD phenotypes, infection outcomes and immunomodulatory therapies. METHODS: In this multi-center study, we prospectively followed IBD patients with proven COVID-19. De-identified data from medical charts were collected including age, gender, IBD type, IBD clinical activity, IBD treatments, comorbidities, symptoms and outcomes of COVID-19. A multivariable regression model was used to examine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on the risk of infection by COVID-19 and the outcomes. RESULTS: Of 144 IBD patients, 104 (72%) were CD and 40 (28%) were UC. Mean age was 32.2 ± 12.6 years. No mortalities were reported. In total, 94 patients (65.3%) received biologic therapy. Of them, 51 (54%) at escalated doses, 10 (11%) in combination with immunomodulators and 9 (10%) with concomitant corticosteroids. Disease location, behavior and activity did not correlate with the severity of COVID-19. Biologics as monotherapy or with immunomodulators or corticosteroids were not associated with more severe infection. On the contrary, patients receiving biologics had significantly milder infection course (p = 0.001) and were less likely to be hospitalized (p = 0.001). Treatment was postponed in 34.7% of patients until recovery from COVID-19, without consequent exacerbation. CONCLUSION: We did not witness aggravated COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IBD. Patients treated with biologics had a favorable outcome.

Advanced Liver Fibrosis Correlates With Impaired Efficacy of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Medical Employees.

The Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine has been offered to nonallergic ≥16-year-old Israeli adults since December 19, 2020. Data regarding factors associated with vaccine ineffectiveness are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of hepatic fibrosis on the efficacy of the BioNTech vaccine. Serum severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike immunoglobulins (S IgG) obtained at least 7 days following vaccination completion was correlated with the prevaccine calculated Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score among 719 employees in the Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem. Positive vaccine response (S IgG levels ≥ 19 AU/mL) was found in 708 of 719 individuals (98.5%). Vaccine failure (S IgG levels < 19) was found in 11 (1.5%); of these, 7 were immunosuppressed. Mean FIB-4 available in 501 of 708 vaccine responders was 1.13 ± 0.66, mean age 51.4 ± 12.4 years (29.3% males), and mean S IgG titers 239.7 ± 86.1 AU/mL. Similar to the general population, 70.5% had normal FIB-4 (<1.3), 26.8% undetermined FIB-4 (1.3-2.67), and 2.7% advanced FIB-4 (>2.67). When divided into response subgroups, 158 of 501 individuals (30.1%) with IgG titers 19-100 AU/mL had a mean FIB-4 of 1.48 ± 0.82; 198 (39.5%) with IgG titers 101-200 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.22 ± 0.76; 83 (16.6%) with titers 201-300 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.04 ± 0.48; 38 (7.6%) individuals with IgG titers 301-400 AU/ml had a mean FIB-4 of 1.08 ± 0.63; and 121 (24.2%) with IgG titers >400 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.18 ± 0.87. Increased FIB-4, age, and male gender significantly correlated with lower postvaccine IgG titers (P < 0.001). FIB-4 results were confirmed using FibroScan data displaying advanced fibrosis impact on weakened COVID-19 vaccine response. Conclusion: Immune suppression, older age, male gender, and advanced chronic liver disease are risk factors for lower vaccine response. The FIB-4 provides a simple tool to prioritize candidates for third-dose vaccine booster.

Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides decrease PD-1 in T cells of healthy subjects and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and increase their proliferation and eradication of HCC cells.

T cells of aged people, and of patients with either cancer or severe infections (including COVID-19), are often exhausted, senescent and dysfunctional, leading to increased susceptibilities, complications and mortality. Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides bind their receptors in T cells, and induce multiple beneficial T cell functions. Yet, T cells of different people vary in the expression levels of Neurotransmitter and Neuropeptide receptors, and in the magnitude of the corresponding effects. Therefore, we performed an individual-based study on T cells of 3 healthy subjects, and 3 Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) patients. HCC usually develops due to chronic inflammation. The inflamed liver induces reduction and inhibition of CD4+ T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cells. Immune-based therapies for HCC are urgently needed. We tested if selected Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides decrease the key checkpoint protein PD-1 in human T cells, and increase proliferation and killing of HCC cells. First, we confirmed human T cells express all dopamine receptors (DRs), and glutamate receptors (GluRs): AMPA-GluR3, NMDA-R and mGluR. Second, we discovered that either Dopamine, Glutamate, GnRH-II, Neuropeptide Y and/or CGRP (10nM), as well as DR and GluR agonists, induced the following effects: 1. Decreased significantly both %PD-1+ T cells and PD-1 expression level per cell (up to 60% decrease, within 1 h only); 2. Increased significantly the number of T cells that proliferated in the presence of HCC cells (up to 7 fold increase), 3. Increased significantly T cell killing of HCC cells (up to 2 fold increase). 4. Few non-conventional combinations of Neurotransmitters and Neuropeptides had surprising synergistic beneficial effects. We conclude that Dopamine, Glutamate, GnRH-II, Neuropeptide Y and CGRP, alone or in combinations, can decrease % PD-1+ T cells and PD-1 expression per cell, in T cells of both healthy subjects and HCC patients, and increase their proliferation in response to HCC cells and killing of HCC cells. Yet, testing T cells of many more cancer patients is absolutely needed. Based on these findings and previous ones, we designed a novel "Personalized Adoptive Neuro-Immunotherapy", calling for validation of safety and efficacy in clinical trials.

Comparison of hospital worker anxiety in COVID-19 treating and non-treating hospitals in the same city during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The Hadassah Medical Organization operates two hospitals in Jerusalem. During the COVID-19 pandemic it made an administrative decision to operate one hospital as a COVID-19 treatment hospital (CTH) and to have the second function as a non-COVID-19 treating hospital (NCTH) offering general medical services. The purpose of this study was to assess how this decision affected hospital worker anxiety. METHODS: From April 27 to May 1, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel, while the country was under lock-down, an electronic questionnaire survey was carried out among hospital workers of the CTH and NCTH. The questionnaire includes personal demographics and attitudes about COVID-19 and assesses present anxiety state using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI-S) validated questionnaire. A STAI-S score of ≥45 was considered to represent clinical anxiety. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 1570 hospital employees (24%). 33.5% of responders had STAI-S scores ≥45. Multivariable regression analysis showed that being a resident doctor (odds ration [OR] 2.13; 95% CL, 1.41-3.23; P = 0.0003), age ≤ 50 (OR, 2.08; 95% Cl, 1.62-2.67; P < .0001), being a nurse (OR, 1.29; 95% CL, 1.01-1.64; P = 0.039), female gender (OR, 1.63; 95% CL, 1.25-2.13; P = 0.0003) and having risk factors for COVID-19 (OR, 1.51; 95% CL, 1.19-1.91; P = 0.0007), but not hospital workplace (p = 0.08), were associated with the presence of clinical anxiety. 69% of the responders had been tested for COVID-19, but only nine were positive. CTH workers estimated that the likelihood of their already being infected with COVID-19 to be 21.5 ± 24.7% as compared to the 15.3 ± 19.5% estimate of NCTH workers (p = 0.0001). 50% (545/1099) of the CTH workers and 51% (168/330) of the NCTH workers responded that the most important cause of their stress was a fear of infecting their families (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: By multivariable analysis the creation of a NCTH during the COVID-19 pandemic was not found to be associated with a decrease in the number of hospital workers with clinical anxiety. Hospital worker support resources can be focused on the at-risk groups identified in this study.

Stress assessment among internal medicine residents in a level-3 hospital versus a level-2 hospital with only emergency room service for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Treating COVID-19 patients can affect anxiety. OBJECTIVE: To compare the anxiety of internal medicine residents treating COVID-19 patients at a level-3 hospital with a level-2 hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire related to COVID-19 and anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) was sent to internal medicine residents of a COVID-19 referral level-3 hospital and a level-2 hospital from which all diagnosed COVID-19 cases are transferred to the COVID-19 referral hospital. RESULTS: Responses were received from 76.3% of the internal medicine residents. There was no difference in the anxiety scores between residents from the level-3 center (44.4) and the level-2 center (44.4), p = 0.9. There was a significant difference between the number of residents from the level-3 center, 22/56 (63%) and the number of residents from the level-2 center, 1/10 (10%) who were concerned about better protective gear (p = 0.003) and between residents from the level-3 center19/35 (54%) and those from the level-2 center, 1/10 (10%) who were concerned about infecting their families (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The internal medicine resident anxiety scores were not a function of hospital level, but safety was less of a concerns in the level-2 center with only emergency room COVID-19 services.